♣♣♣♣/♣♣♣♣♣
Based
on a novel based on the diaries of Anna Leonowens (Menchu Launchengco-Yulo), this
musical tells the story of a British woman who arrives in Bangkok with her son in
the late 1800’s to play governess to the children of then reigning Thai
monarch, King Mongkut (Nonie Buencamino). Set within the glittering confines of
the royal palace, this onstage rendition is characterized by the constant friction
between Anna and the King mainly brought about by their belief systems
influenced by the different cultures from which they have been brought up. A
love angle is also suggested all throughout the play, but just lingers in the
background and is not pursued. This material has had several incarnations,
including several movies, of which that one with Jodie Foster and Chow Yun Fat
is well-remembered. The onstage version adds music and choreography that
guarantees an enjoyable experience.
Staging
a musical with a cast made up of Thais is not that difficult to do in the
Philippines. Hey, we are all Southeast Asians. We resemble each other whether
we like it or not. And although only three of four of them are supposed to be
European, one would not be that hard pressed to find someone who looks
Caucasian here. Enter Menchu Lauchengco Yulo. Her features look western
alright, and with that British accent down pat, you really would not find anything
wrong with her portrayal. Despite the elaborate costumes and awesome portrayal,
her turn as Diana Goodman in Next to Normal, however, still remains to be the
personal favorite in terms of raw emotion and stage presence.
Nonie
Buencamino is no newcomer to musical theater, with credentials also involving
western remakes such as that opposite Dawn Zulueta when they starred in A
Winter Night Musical. Aside from the obvious observation that he looks the
part, his portrayal of a comical King Mongkut definitely caught the audience’s
funny bone. The interesting contrast though is how he is seen later after the
show, as people are lined up waiting for taxis, getting out of the building in
ordinary clothes, went straight to 7-11 to buy something, and eventually left,
perhaps taking the public commute. He is such a simple guy, and in contrast to
the role that he just played, you could not help but admire how great of an
actor he is, or all of them for that matter for lending us the onstage
credibility that makes everything we see believable.
The
rest of the cast are also worthy of praise. Tuptim (Tanya Manalang) gets most
of the lung-busting songs, mostly duets with Lun Tha (Lorenz Martinez). Lady
Thiang (Gina Respall) also wows with her sweet soprano and honest performance
as the king’s consort who knows her place within the royal court and wholeheartedly
accepts the fact that she is not really in the position to do anything about
it. She is one sad character who covers up heartbreak with a stern mask of
authority among the concubines. The kids are too adorable, particularly those
three boys in blue who look alike! There are plenty of them, and they make this
show so cute to watch, a perfect distraction from the main story arc concerning
Anna and the King, as well as that romantic subplot between Tuptim and Lun Tha.
Coming
right after The Sound of Music in Resorts World Manila’s theater line-up since
they started, one could not help but compare the similarities, basically on how
the two main characters often disagree and end up falling in love. The setting
also calls for some immediate change in terms of regimes and status quo which
greatly affects the actions of the characters. Both leading ladies originally
cast are Filipinas who have made a name in the West End scene. The difference
would be on the production values, more or less. This is not to say that The
Sound of Music was staged with amateur sets and stuff, but rather because of the
setting of The King and I in a palace, which means that the predominant hues of
dazzling gold would be quite difficult to ignore. You want world class? This is
absolutely world class.
Why
the 4/5 then? Given the observations abovementioned, this particular staging of
the musical deserves a 5/5 for the technical aspects, production design, and
the acting, of course. One clover less is because of the material itself and
how absurd it all seems to be, pretty much more than two hours of lèse-majesté
onstage. You could understand why anyone from Thailand will flinch at the very
idea. While we all know that it is fiction, the characters portrayed, or better
yet, their descendants, are very much alive and kicking today. The concept of
monarchy itself is rather outdated and those subscribed to that ideal had no
choice but to adapt to the modern world, but still, there is a lot of respect
going on for any of them to be portrayed in such a cartoonish,
bordering-on-caricature kind of way. These historical figures symbolize a plethora
of ideas and beliefs that whole nations hold dear to heart, and that is where
the controversy lies. But yeah, if your going to be technical about it, this
musical is worth the admission ticket. Leave your knowledge of history and
society at the ticket counter first, maybe.
0 creature(s) gave a damn:
Post a Comment