Try
as they might, the Avengers find it hard to leave a collateral damage free
scene whenever they pursue their enemies. Despite their obvious efforts in
making the world a better place, a part of the general public is demanding for
accountability, prompting world governments to come up with a mutant
registration initiative in an effort to protect their citizens from those who are
actually protecting them. Considering what happened in Sokovia, such a political
move is just understandable, but the Avengers are not in unison as to how they
should react to the issue. Iron Man (Tony Stark) and Black Widow (Scarlett
Johansson) both agree, which is a first, but Captain America (Chris Evans)
thinks that this would limit their efficiency and freedom as a group.
When Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan) is framed for a crime that he did not
commit, Steve Rogers is forced to choose between his best friend and the
ensemble that has been his family since he was thawed after decades in the ice.
This
is more of an Avengers film than a Captain America one, leading many to dub it
as Avengers 2.5. While the ensemble has incredibly grown larger, the focus of
the story is still the friendship between Steve Rogers and Bucky Barnes. In
fact, it is around this friendship that the entire plot revolves. The
involvement of the Avengers crew and the newbies seems to be just a consequence of
different circumstances that unfold in the movie’s more than two-hour run.
One
can actually frame the film in a different way that puts the spotlight more
on Captain America and the Winter Soldier, but perhaps it is a marketing
decision to play up the Avengers connection. What suffers most in the way they
have devised the storyline is the premise itself. Anyone who has read Civil War
will feel shortchanged after watching this movie, due to the fact that the
issue dealt with in the comics had a lot more gravitas than what is presented
in this film adaptation.
Some
would even go as far as to accuse Disney of just using the comic book reference
so as to sound more legit, when in fact they seem to have utilized it as a mere
plot device that would conveniently lead to a royal rumble of epic proportions.
They know that the moviegoing public is already emotionally invested in these
characters. Pitting them against one another is definitely a surefire way of
milking the franchise. Are we complaining? Maybe just a little bit, the end
product is still a joy to watch after all.
Civil
War is undeniably a Marvel film, from the manner by which the plot is laid out
all the way to the dialogues and one-liners full of wit. But the main draw
has to be the very what-if scenario of these heroes taking on each other. Who wins?
Who loses? If you think you already know the answer because you have read the
comic book beforehand, then you will be disappointed. A lot of detours are
taken here to give way to Disney’s long list of upcoming sequels. Did you
really think they’d be faithful to the comics?
But
what makes Civil War a successful ensemble film is that almost every character’s
involvement is justified, and although not all of their intentions are clear,
the mere fact that they have a motivation for their actions and position regarding
the big issue at hand is already convincing enough for you to forgive the
storyline’s flaws. It helps that most of them have already been
introduced by virtue of their standalone films. That way, much of the
screentime is not lost on lengthy character introductions.
Black
Panther (Chadwick Boseman) makes an impressive cinematic debut, and his
involvement will just trigger more curiosity with regards to his background,
and that is always a good thing if you have your own movie coming up. Watching
another Spider-Man reboot will be a really daunting task, but Tom Holland’s take
on a much younger Web Slinger might just be what Disney needs to reinvent what
Sony has been milking on for almost two decades now. Let’s keep our fingers
crossed.
0 creature(s) gave a damn:
Post a Comment