♣♣♣♣/♣♣♣♣♣
The
biggest name in the Mexican fashion industry, Evaristo Jiménez (Miguel Rodarte)
has built his empire based on his status as Mexico’s biggest gay icon. But
everyone has a dirty little secret that eventually threatens their careers. For
Evo, it’s the fact that he has slept with 322 women in the last six months. Shifting
to damage control, he gets a boyfriend to flaunt around to distract the press
from his real sexual orientation. Sandro (Renato López), the new production
assistant, is still reeling from the death of his husband three years prior. While
everything is just a game of media manipulation for his boss, he starts to
develop feelings for him, which causes more friction between the two of them. What
Evo can’t explain is how he always feels inspired when Sandy is around, helping
him get over the mental block hindering him from creating enough designs for
his new collection, up to a point when he himself begins to doubt his very own sexuality.
Perhaps
the first question you are going to ask, out of curiosity, is what the real
deal is regarding Evaristo’s sexual preference. Is he really gay? Or is he just
pretending to be one? The interesting thing is that you can’t really tell even
after watching the movie. His flashy demeanor and flamboyance seem to coincide
with the traditional criteria defining a homosexual man, but his sexual
activities point to the other direction. If a gay guy sleeps with women,
is he still gay? No, society will tell you that he must be
bisexual. What if he never slept with a man before in his life? Then the world
will theorize that maybe he is heterosexual all along. Despite the
loopholes, this movie does succeed in bringing forward a social phenomenon
causing many of us all this unnecessary trouble: our obsession with labels.
We
have come to a point in our existence as a species where everything must have a
corresponding tag, terminologies meant to box us in an idea or a concept
charged with classifications that have been converted into stereotypes over the
course of time. It comes as a detriment because it restricts the individual to
the limits of such labels. If you are this, then you should be like that and
shouldn’t do this. It’s a normative nightmare that fails to capture the true
definition of a person, and thus, results in conflict.
But
let’s not hijack this movie review by tossing in a big social issue that
deserves its own elevated form of discourse. Macho is not a cinematic
phenomenon meant to revolutionize the way the LGBT community is depicted on the
big screen. In fact, various feedback has been in unison, critical of how
certain stereotypes are perpetuated by the storyline instead of crushed. Clichés
are embraced instead of avoided, and there is just that shroud of familiarity
making you feel as though you have already seen this particular plot unfold
before. Perhaps, that is this film’s biggest pitfall.
The
acting is campy, but justifiably so. There are genres that jive well with such
acting style. To reimagine Macho with a more subdued acting would probably make
it feel more like an indie flick not palatable enough for mainstream audiences
to enjoy. In a way, it also serves as some sort of parody of the fashion
industry, how everything is made to appear superficial, shallow, and petty.
The
movie offers a visually appealing finished product that
is just pleasant to the eyes. Take the opening sequence, for instance, where bold
white, red, and blue hues are maximized to create an eye-popping scene
juxtaposed with a soundtrack straight out of the MTV era. Almost everyone in the cast
is also seen dressed to the nines in most of their scenes, given the fashion
industry setting. The production design then goes the extra mile by aiming for
the same effect with the environment itself, using avant-garde architectural
designs that play in harmony with everyone’s outfits.
As
for the plot and character development, both are rather all over the place. Evo’s
evolution as a character feels contrived, and his motivations are neither clear
nor logical most of the time. The film does provide a good temporary distraction
for a lazy weekend, but the controversial theme that it tackles will always
bring about some complications that might be bad overall. On one hand, it can
be viewed as an opportunity to take a solid stand on the issue. On the other hand, the
tricky subject matter could also lead to a case of oversimplification, which
will not sit well with many. For a better viewing experience, just lower your
expectations and enjoy the ride.
0 creature(s) gave a damn:
Post a Comment